Reviewing Service Quality of UBER: Between Customer Satisfaction and Customer Expectation

  • Valentine Siagian +886-986406767
Keywords: service quality, customer satisfaction, sharing economy

Abstract

This paper examines the gap between the expected service and reality from Uber’s customer perception. Service companies tend to be careful and pay more attention to their customers’ satisfaction and aim to have a good relationship to ensure their loyalty. Service quality dimension was used and applied to find the gap between customer satisfaction and customer expectation. The hypothesis was tested in the empirical study to find how service quality (with five dimensions: tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy) affects customer satisfaction on using Uber service. 105 international students from Indonesia who lives in Taiwan and experienced riding with Uber in Taiwan filled out the online questionnaire. SPSS 23 was used to do the analysis. The result of F-test shows that customer satisfaction positively influenced by service quality, while t-test shows that there is improvement needed on responsiveness and empathy dimension. Rating system from Uber declares that customer satisfaction is 4.6 out of 5, this paper shows that customer satisfaction is 4.3 out of 5 from service quality dimension. Statistically this is a significant gap that needs to be filled to reach a closer gap to the expected service. This research can be done with a wider range to know more about customers’ delight on using Uber. Language barrier between customer and Uber driver could be the reason of the gap. Including Taiwanese students as respondents could be done for further research.  
Article Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asubonteng, P., K. J., McCleary, & J.E., Swan. (1996). SERVQUAL revisited: a critical review

of service quality. Journal of Services Marketing 10 (6): 62-81.

Brooks, R. F., I. N. Lings, & M. A. Botschen. (1999). Internal marketing and customer driven

wavefronts. Service Industries Journal 19 (4): 49-67.

Chaston, I. (1994). Internal customer management and service gaps within the UK

manufacturing sector. International Journal of Operations & Production

Management 14 (9): 45-56.

Donnelly, M., E. Shiu, J. F. Dalrymple, & M. Wisniewski. (1996). Adapting the SERVQUAL

scale and approach to meet the needs of local authority services, Total Quality

Management in Action, pp: 263-266.

Dotchin, J. A., and J. S. Oakland. (1994). Total quality management in services: Part 3:

Distinguishing perceptions of service quality. International Journal of Quality &

Reliability Management. 11 (4): 6-28.

Edvardsson, B. (1997). Quality in new service development: Key concepts and a frame of

reference. International Journal of Production Economics 52(1-2): 31-46.

Hauser, J. R., and S. M., Shugan. (1983). Defensive Marketing Strategies. Marketing

Science 2: 319-360.

Holbrook, M. B. (1994). The nature of customer value: an axiology of services in the

consumption experience. Service quality: New directions in theory and practice. 21:

-71.

Hsu, C. L., Lin, C. S., & Chen, M. C. (2011). Exploring logistics services quality in home

delivery industry: Do service providers and customers have different viewpoints? .品

質學報, 18(5): 439-454.

Lewis, B. R., and V. W. Mitchell. (1990). Defining and measuring the quality of customer

service. Marketing Intelligence and Planning 8(6): 11-17.

Lings, I. N., and R. F. Brooks. (1998). Implementing and measuring the effectiveness of

internal marketing. Journal of Marketing Management 14(4): 325-351.

Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. (1985). A conceptual model of service

quality and its implications for future research. The Journal of Marketing: 41-50.

Reichheld. F, and W. Sasser W. (1990). Zero defections: Quality comes to services, Harvard

Business Review 68(5): 105-111.

Reynoso, J., and B. Moores, B. (1995). Towards the measurement of internal service quality.

International Journal of Service Industry Management 6(3): 64-83.

Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic Prices & Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure

Competition. Journal of Political Economy 82 (1): 34-55.

Sahney, S., D. K. Banwet, & S. Karunes. (2004). A SERVQUAL and QFD approach to total

quality education: A student perspective. International Journal of Productivity and

Performance Management 53(2): 143-166.

Sekaran, U., and R. Bougie. (1992). Research Method for Business, A Skill Building Approach,

John Wiley & Sons Inc.:New York.

Steenkamp, J. B. E. (1989). Product quality, An Investigation into the Concept and How it is

Perceived by Consumers. Van Gorsum. Assen/Maastricht.

Tang, L. L., and T. H. Nguyen. (2013). Common causes of trust, satisfaction and TAM in

online shopping: An integrated Model, 品質學報, 20(5): 483-501.

Tang, L. L., C. H. Hsu, & O.C Kiet. (2014). Acceptance of Web-Based E-Learning Systems:

Behavioral Intention and Impacts, International Journal of Innovation in

Management 2(1): 37-52.

Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model

and synthesis of evidence. The Journal of Marketing: 2-22.

Wisniewski, M. (2001). Using SERVQUAL to assess customer satisfaction with public sector

services, Managing Service Quality: An International Journal 11(6): 380-388.

Young, J. A., and D. L. Varble. (1997). Purchasing's performance as seen by its internal

customers: a study in a service organization, International Journal of Purchasing and

Materials Management 33(2): 36-41.

Published
2019-12-18
How to Cite
Siagian, V. (2019). Reviewing Service Quality of UBER: Between Customer Satisfaction and Customer Expectation. Abstract Proceedings International Scholars Conference, 7(1), 1283-1292. https://doi.org/10.35974/isc.v7i1.1976