Through the Lens of Solitude: Capturing the Realities of Singlehood Stigma Among Women

Authors

  • Cutie Bacubas Canesares Adventist University of the Philippines
  • Ivana Jae Bitangcol Adventist University of the Philippines
  • Kyne Castaneda Adventist University of the Philippines
  • Danielle Kate Fontamillas Adventist University of the Philippines
  • Danielle Rich Quilas Adventist University of the Philippines

Keywords:

singlehood, stigmatization, women empowerment, photovoice, phenomenon

Abstract

Singleness is a phenomenon that has gained popularity and acceptance over the past few years, as evidenced by the growing trends in many societies. However, many single women in the Philippines belonging to the age group of 30-35 remain stigmatized. In hopes of comprehending their intriguing situation, the researchers delved into their personal narratives using Photovoice methodology. Using purposive sampling, six participants were chosen based on their age range (30–35), duration of singleness status (at least 5 years), and period of residing time in the Philippines (since age 19 and beyond). They were grouped into three pairs according to geographic proximity and were instructed to select five photos that would most accurately reflect their answers to the questions on their 1) perceived and internalized stigma, and 2) ways of seeking empowerment to counteract it. After the selection of photos, thematizing was done using the PHOTO Analysis framework. The themes for their perceived and internalized stigma were: (a) Lonely, (b) Incomplete, (c) Unpreferred and Unattractive, (d) Two is Better than One, and (e) Envious but Choosy. Meanwhile, four themes that pertain to participants' ways to seek empowerment in their singleness were: (a) Finding Direction from God and Church, (b) Fostering Friendship, (c) Reading Books, and (d) Recognizing Self-Worth. The researchers recommend future researchers to conduct longitudinal studies to gauge shifts in attitudes toward singleness and comparative analysis to examine varying levels of stigma and identify factors that contribute to their similarities and differences.

Article Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adamczyk K. (2017). Voluntary and involuntary singlehood and young adults’ mental health: an investigation of mediating role of romantic loneliness. Curr Psychol., 36(1):888–904. https://doi: 10.1007/s12144-016-9478-3.

Adamczyk K. & Segrin C. (2015a). Direct and indirect effects of young adults’ relationship status on life satisfaction through loneliness and perceived social support. Psychological Belgica, 55(4), 196–211. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.bn.

Adamczyk K. & Segrin C. (2015b). Perceived social support and mental health among single vs. partnered Polish young adults. Current Psychology, 34(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9242-5.

Alcasid, E., Peralta, L., Pinlac, M. A., Ramirez, E., Shimada, M., & al, e. (2017). #Fillenials: Understanding the Filipino Millenial Generation. Research Paper, University of the Philippines Diliman, Department of Anthropology, Quezon City.

Ang, C., Lee, K., & Lie, X. (2020). Understanding Singleness: A Phenomenological Study of Single Women in Beijing and Singapore. The Qualitative Report, 25(8), 3080-3100. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4269

Apostolou, M., Jiaqing, O., & Esposito, G. (2020). Singles’ reasons for being Single: Empirical evidence from an evolutionary perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00746.

Byrne A. & Carr D. (2005). Caught in the cultural lag: the stigma of singlehood. Psychol Inquiry,16(2–3):84–90.

Cabalza, C. B. (2018). Goin’Solo: A Study on Singlehood and Views on ‘Sologamy’in the Contemporary Philippine Society.

Census of India. (2011). Houselisting and housing census data. Retrieved from: http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census.

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206.

Cejuela, M. G. (2019). Celebrating Singlehood in the Age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. DLSU Research Congress 2019. https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/pdf/conferences/research-congress-proceedings/2019/wcfe-I-003.pdf.

Community Tool Box. (n.d.). Chapter 3. Assessing Community needs and resources | Section 20. Implementing Photovoice in your community | Main section | Community Tool Box. https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/assessment/assessing-community-needs-and-resources/photovoice/main.

Dommaraju, P. (2015). One-person households in India. Demographic Research, 32, 1239–1266.

Gubrium, J. F. (1975). Being single in old age. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 6(1), 29-41. doi:10.2190/31lw-101q-0pwx-vv9j.

Gui, T. (2020). “Leftover women” or single by choice: Gender role negotiation of single professional women in contemporary China. Journal of Family Issues, 41(11), 1956-1978.

Guilmoto, C., & de Loenzien, M. (2015). Emerging, transitory or residual? One-person households in Viet Nam. Demographic Research, S15(42), 1147–1176. http://www.demographic-research.org/special/15/42/.

Howe, N., (2015). The Return of the Spinster. https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilhowe/2015/.

Hussey, W. (2006). Slivers of the journey: the use of Photovoice and storytelling to examine female to male transsexuals' experience of health care access. Journal of homosexuality, 51(1), 129-158.

Ibrahim, R., & Hassan, Z. (2009). Understanding Singlehood from the Experiences of Never-Married Malay Muslim Women in Malaysia: Some Preliminary Findings. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242190636_Understanding_Singlehood_from_the_Experiences_of_Never-Married_Malay_Muslim_Women_in_Malaysia_Some_Preliminary_Findings.

Kammeyer, K., Cargan, L., & Melko, M. (1982). Singles: Myths and Realities. . https://doi.org/10.2307/2578733.

Klinenberg, E. (2012). Going solo: The extraordinary rise and surprising appeal of living alone. Penguin Press.

Krägeloh, C., Chai, P., Shepherd, D., & Billington, R. (2012). How Religious Coping is Used Relative to Other Coping Strategies Depends on the Individual’s Level of Religiosity and Spirituality. Journal of Religion and Health, 51, 1137-1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-010-9416-x.

Lesch, E., & Watt, A. (2018). Living single: A phenomenological study of a group of South African single women. Feminism & Psychology, 28, 390 -408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517731435.

MacFarlane, L. K. (2017, October 5). What is Photovoice? Duke Global Health Institute. https://globalhealth.duke.edu/news/what-photovoice.

Nasirian, K., & Taheri, H. (2019). EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD). EPRA International Journal of Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016.

Nikolopoulou, K. (2023). What is purposive sampling? | Definition & Examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/purposive-sampling/.

Norouzi, S., Tamiz, R., Naghizadeh, S., Mobasseri, K., Imani, L., Esmaeili, P., Hamitalab, R., Rahmani, F., & Jafarabadi, M. A. (2022). Marriage survival in new married couples: A competing risks survival analysis. PLOS ONE, 17(8), e0272908. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272908.

Nykiforuk, C. I. J., Vallianatos, H., & Nieuwendyk, L. M. (2011). Photovoice as a method for revealing community perceptions of the built and social environment. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(2), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691101000201.

Philippine Statistics Authority. (2020, February 14). Single Population in the Philippines (Results from the 2015 Census of Population) | Philippine Statistics Authority | Republic of the Philippines. https://psa.gov.ph/content/single-population-philippines-results-2015-census-population.

Podhisita, C., & Xenos, P. (2015). Living alone in south and Southeast Asia: An analysis of census data. Demographic Research, S15(41), 1113–1146. http://www.demographic-research.org/special/15/41/.

Prezza M., Pacilli M. (2002). Perceived social support from significant others, family and friends and several socio-demographic characteristics. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 12(6), 422–429. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.696.

Rai, N., & Thapa, B. (2015). A study on purposive sampling method in research. Kathmandu: Kathmandu School of Law, 5.

Reyes-laureano, R. C., (2012). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of the Experiences of Single Filipino Women. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 45(1). http://ejournals.ph/form/cite.php?id=3920.

Ryan, W., & Ryan, R. (2019). Toward a Social Psychology of Authenticity: Exploring Within-Person Variation in Autonomy, Congruence, and Genuineness Using Self-Determination Theory. Review of General Psychology, 23, 112 - 99. https://doi.org/10.1037/GPR0000162.

Saksena, J., & McMorrow, S. L. (2020). Through their eyes: A photovoice and interview exploration of integration experiences of Congolese refugee women in Indianapolis. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 21, 529-549.

Shahrak, S. P., Brand, S., & Taghizadeh, Z. (2021). Living with singleness: needs and concerns of never-married women over 35. BMC Psychology, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00635-1.

Skipper, A. D., Marks, L. D., Moore, T., & Dollahite, D. C. (2021). Black marriages matter: Wisdom and advice from happily married black couples. Family Relations, 70(5), 1369–1383.

Sutton, A. (2020). Living the good life: A meta-analysis of authenticity, well-being and engagement. Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109645.

Yu, Y. (2021). Metaphorical representations of “leftover women”: between traditional patriarchy and modern egalitarianism. Social semiotics, 31(2), 248-265.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-23

How to Cite

Canesares, C. B., Bitangcol, I. J., Castaneda, K., Fontamillas, D. K. ., & Quilas, D. R. (2024). Through the Lens of Solitude: Capturing the Realities of Singlehood Stigma Among Women. 11th International Scholars Conference, 11(2), 567-578. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unai.edu/index.php/isc/article/view/3493