Unveiling the Impact: Survey-Based Analysis of Teacher Use of Educational Platforms

Authors

  • Caroline V Katemba Universitas Advent Indonesia
  • Marisha Danielle Manullang Universitas Advent Indonesia
  • Fracika Nauli Siregar Universitas Advent Indonesia
  • Ribka Sari Sinaga Universitas Advent Indonesia
  • Ester Karliova Tarigan Universitas Advent Indonesia
  • Debora Srininta Sembiring Universitas Advent Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.35974/isc.v11i4.3684

Keywords:

E-Learning Platforms, Quizizz, Digital Resources, Instructional Challenges, Platform Suggestions

Abstract

This study examines the usage, preferences, and difficulties of educational platforms among currently employed instructors. To gain insights, the research surveyed 42 teachers through google form about their use and preferences for various platforms. The finding reveals that Quizizz was found to be the most preferred platform among the 42 teachers surveyed, with 55.5% adopting it because to its exceptional engagement and interactive features. The utilization rates for specialized educational gateways like PBS Learning Media, Hello English, and Kipin School are at 4.8%. Among the teachers polled, 2.4% implemented CK-12 and Meja Kita, while none used edX or Busuu. Remarkably, 59.5% of teachers employed YouTube, Google Classroom, and Canva, suggesting a customized approach to address the unique requirements of their courses. While rural areas stress offline and regional educational resources, urban environments usually use gamified and interactive technologies. The COVID-19 outbreak has accelerated the general adoption of digital tools, causing continuous transformation in mixed learning. Improvements in technical resilience, adaptability, user interfaces, and complex interactive features should define emerging systems of the future. To enhance quality and achieve better results, educational platforms should focus on addressing these specific areas of teaching demands.

Article Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bebell, D., & O'Dwyer, L. M. (2019). Educational technology and its impact on student achievement: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 39(2), 209-232. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.39.2.f

Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2020). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Policy, 41(2), 191-210. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312462252

Chou, P.-N., & Chen, W.-F. (2024). The Impact of E-Learning Platforms on Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes: A Study of 2024 Trends. Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 145-163.

Davis, N., & Tearle, P. (2022). Evaluating the impact of educational technology on teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2444-2452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.013

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2021). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551

Hernandez, R., & Garcia, J. (2024). Adaptive Learning Technologies: Transforming Classroom Teaching in 2024. Educational Technology Review, 58(1), 87-104.

Johnson, L., & Adams Becker, S. (2021). The NMC Horizon Report: 2021 Higher Education Edition. EDUCAUSE Review. Retrieved from https://www.educause.edu

Sembiring, H., & Katemba, C. (2023). The Use of Youtube English Educational Videos in Improving Listening Comprehension. Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 6(1), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.33503/journey.v6i1.2681

Katemba, C.V. (2022), Vocabulary Enhancement through Multimedia Learning Among Grade 7th EFL Students. MEXTESOL Journal, Vol.46 no.1, 2022.

Katemba, C., & Sinuhaji, G. (2021). Can ESA Method Through Quizizz Games Enhance Vocabulary Knowledge? International Journal of Game-Based Learning (IJGBL), Vol. 11 no. 3. DOI: 10.4018/IJGBL.2021070102

Keller, J. M. (2023). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer Science & Business Media.

Khan, S. (2023). Digital transformation in Indonesian education: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Education and Technology, 17(2), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2023.1234567

Lee, J., & Choi, H. (2024). The impact of digital literacy on technology integration in classrooms: A global perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(1), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-09765-9

artin, K., & Wilson, L. (2024). Gamification and E-Learning: Exploring the Effects of Game-Based Platforms on Student Motivation and Performance. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 35(4), 321-339.

Miller, A., & McLean, L. (2023). Evaluating the effectiveness of digital learning tools: A comprehensive review. Computers & Education, 105, 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.103334

Patel, R., & Reddy, A. (2023). Optimizing technology use in education: Best practices and future directions. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 26(3), 67-82. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23456789

Rosenberg, M. J. (2024). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. McGraw-Hill.

Smith, J., & Lee, A. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Educational Platforms: Enhancing Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Educational Innovation, 12(3), 245-262.

Published

2024-10-23

How to Cite

Katemba, C., Manullang, M. D. ., Siregar, F. N. ., Sinaga, R. S. ., Tarigan, E. K. ., & Sembiring, D. S. . (2024). Unveiling the Impact: Survey-Based Analysis of Teacher Use of Educational Platforms. 11th International Scholars Conference, 11(4), 1362-1375. https://doi.org/10.35974/isc.v11i4.3684