Interpretation of Selected Parables in the Synoptic Gospels (SG): A Comparative Study of Ellen G. White’s Interpretation of Selected Synoptic Gospels’ Parables and Some Biblical Scholars

  • Alfredo, Jr. Gomeri Agustin Asia-Pacific International University
Keywords: Synoptic Gospels, Interpretation of Parables, Biblical Scholars‟ Interpretation of Parables, Ellen G. White‟s Interpretation of Parables

Abstract

Seventh-day Adventist (SDA) Biblical Scholars (BS) and Theologians assert that EGWaccepts and applies principles of biblical interpretation when she interprets the Scripture.However, there seems to be lack of academic research to prove such presupposition.One area that seems to be lacking is the comparison between EGW‟s interpretation of gospelparables with that of modern biblical scholars. Their interpretations of selected SG parableswill be compared and contrasted with that of EGW. The purpose of this study is to prove thatEGW‟s interpretation of gospel parables are in harmony with sound principles of interpretingbiblical parables.This study compares and contrasts EGW and selected modern BS‟s interpretations of selectedsynoptic gospel parables. After comparing EGW and selected BS‟s interpretation of selectedparables in the SG, evaluation will follow.This paper concludes that EGW interprets the selected parables of the SG appropriately. Thecomparative study shows that she is not out of context in her interpretation of the parables.This means that she applies sound principles of biblical interpretation. It also shows that sheagrees with the interpretation of some non-SDA BS. However, she has additional insightswhich were not found in BS.
Article Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alcorn, R. (2004). Heaven. Carol Stream, Ill.: Tyndale.

Berkof, L. (1950). Principle of Biblical Interpretation. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.

Blomberg, C. (2012). Interpreting the Parables. Nottingham, England: InterVarsity; Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity.

Gooding, D. (1987). According to Luke. Leicester, UK: Inter-Varsity; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

Hasel, G. (1985). Biblical Interpretation Today. Washington, DC: Biblical Research Institute.

Hasel, G. Understanding the Living Word of God. Mountain View, CA: Pacific

Press.

Hultgren, A. (2000). The Parables of Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Khoo, J. (1998). “The Reality and Eternality of Hell: Luke 16:19-31 as Proof,” STJ 6: 67-76.

Kistemaker, S. J. (1987). The Parables of Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.

Pfandl, G. (2005). “Ellen G. White and Hermeneutics,” in Understanding Scripture: An Adventist Approach, Biblical Research Institute Studies, vol. 1. Silver Spring, MD: Biblical Research Institute.

Ramm, B. (1970). Protestant Biblical Interpretation. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.

Sider, J. W. (1995). Interpreting the Parables. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

Snodgrass, K. R. (2008). Stories with Intent: A Comprehensive Guide to the Parables of Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

White, E. G. (1900; 2002). Christ's Object Lessons. Hagerstown, MD: Review and Herald Publishing Association.

White, E. G. (1911). The Great Controversy Between Christ and Satan. Pacific Press Publishing Association.

White, E. G. (1855; 2002). Testimonies for the Church, Volumes 5. Nampa, ID: Pacific Press Publishing Association.

White, E. G. (1855; 2002). Testimonies for the Church, Volumes 8. Nampa, ID: Pacific Press Publishing Association.

Published
2019-12-18
How to Cite
Agustin, A. J. (2019). Interpretation of Selected Parables in the Synoptic Gospels (SG): A Comparative Study of Ellen G. White’s Interpretation of Selected Synoptic Gospels’ Parables and Some Biblical Scholars. Abstract Proceedings International Scholars Conference, 7(1), 2033-2044. https://doi.org/10.35974/isc.v7i1.936