AUDIT FEE AND TIME BUDGET PRESSURE ON AUDIT QUALITY (AN EMPIRICAL STUDY IN LOCAL CPA FIRMS IN JAKARTA, INDONESIA)
Kata Kunci:
business entity, audit fee, time budget pressureAbstrak
Audit quality is the aim of every business entity. A high quality audit gives a reliable information to all financial statements users. This study aims to examine the effect of audit fee (AF), time budget pressure (TBP) on audit quality (AQ) at several CPA firms in the city of Jakarta. Research questionnaire was used to gather research data which compose of nine (9) indicators and 30 research statements. There were four (4) Local CPA firms who participated to answer the questionnaire. Data collected were processed, interpreted and concluded. The results showed that audit fees and time budget pressure have significant effect on audit quality with a significance value of 0.014 while time budget pressure has a significant effect on audit quality with a significance value of 0.000, and audit fees and time budget pressure have a simultaneous effect on audit quality with a significance value of 0.000. This study implies that audit fee and time budget pressure pays a vital role to achieve a good and credible financial statements.
Referensi
Ardani, S. V. (2017). Pengaruh Tenure Audit, Rotasi Audit, Audit Fee terhadap Kualitas Audit dengan Komite Audit Sebagai Variabel Moderasi (Studi pada Perusahaan Sektor Keuangan yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2010-2014). Jurnal Akuntansi, 6(1), 1–12.
Arens. (2014). Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integreted Approach.
Cho, M., Young, S., & Krishnan, G. V. (2020). J . Account . Public Policy Audit fee lowballing : Determinants , recovery , and future audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, xxxx, 106787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2020.106787
Choi, J. H., Kim, C., Kim, J. B., & Zang, Y. (2010). Audit office size, audit quality, and audit pricing. Auditing, 29(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.73
Choi, J. H., Kim, J. B., & Zang, Y. (2010). Do abnormally high audit fees impair audit quality? Auditing, 29(2), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.2.115
Christensen, B. E., Glover, S. M., Omer, T. C., & Shelley, M. K. (2016). Understanding Audit Quality: Insights from Audit Professionals and Investors. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(4), 1648–1684. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12212
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit fees. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199.
Guizani, M., & Abdalkrim, G. (2021). Ownership structure and audit quality : the mediating effect of board independence. 21(5), 754–774. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-12-2019-0369
Haddad, A. (2022). The Impact of the External Audit Quality on the Financial Performance of Conventional and Islamic Banks. Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies, 16(2), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/25765949.2022.2061156
Hai, P. T., & Nang, D. (2019). EFFECT OF AUDIT ROTATION , AUDIT FEE AND AUDITOR COMPETENCE TO MOTIVATION AUDITOR AND AUDIT QUALITY : EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE IN VIETNAM. 23(2), 1–14.
Harianja & Sinaga. (2019). The Effect of Audit Fee Audit Delay and Auditor Switching on Audit Quality. 6(1), 23–31.
Jaya, T. E., Irene, & Choirul. (2016). Skepticism, Time Limitation of Audit, Ethics of Professional Accountant and Audit Quality (Case Study in Jakarta, Indonesia). Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 5(3), 173–182. http://buscompress.com/journal-home.html
Sinaga, J. G., & SINAGA, V. C. (2019). The Effect of Audit Firm Age and Audit Tenure on Audit Quality (An Empirical Study on Trusted Company Awardees Listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange 2011-2016). Abstract Proceedings International Scholars Conference, 7(1), 1293–1314. https://doi.org/10.35974/isc.v7i1.1978
Sinaga, J. T. G. (n.d.). Preserving Auditor ’ s Independence , Competence , and Coping Time Budget Pressure : Keys to CPA firm ’ s Survival in the Era of Disruption ( A Study on Local CPA Firm ). 14–25.
Wilkin, C. L., & Chenhall, R. H. (2010). A Review of IT Governance : A Taxonomy to Inform Accounting Information Systems. 24(2), 107–146. https://doi.org/10.2308/jis.2010.24.2.107
