Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

The TeIKA journal fundamentally supports the development of research that applies the principles of research ethics.

AUTHOR'S RESPONSIBILITY

Research Reporting Standards.

The authors of the article report the actual research outcomes and present the research reports accurately. The discussion in the article is written objectively about its significance by writing down the underlying data accurately. Research articles must be written completely and clearly with adequate references in order to allow replication of the work. Statements that are deceptive or intentionally inaccurate are unethical and unacceptable behavior. The process of reviewing professional published articles must also be accurate and objective, and editorial work of other authors' ideas should be clearly identified as usual.

Data Access and Preservation

Authors may be asked to provide raw data in connection with research articles for editorial review. The author, if possible, is expected to be willing to provide access to the public regarding the data. Authors are expected to retain and maintain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Authenticity of Articles and Plagiarism

The authors are expected to be able to ensure that the scientific papers published are completely original. If the author uses the work and/or words of another author, the citation is properly cited. Plagiarism takes many forms, from 'ignoring' other papers as the author's own, to copying or paraphrasing large portions of other people's papers (without attribution), to claiming results from research done by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Multiple or Concurrent Publications

An author may not generally publish articles that essentially describe the same research in more than one journal or major publication. Submitting the same article to more than one journal at the same time is unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior. In general, an author is not allowed to submit for consideration in other journals previously published articles. Publication of several types of articles (eg: clinical guidelines, translations) in more than one journal is sometimes justified, provided that the requirements of the rules applicable in these circumstances are met. Authors and editors of the relevant journal must approve secondary publications, which must reflect the same data and interpretation of the primary document. Primary references should be cited in secondary publications.

Source Acknowledgment

Appropriate acknowledgment of the work of others should always be given. Authors should cite publications that were influential in determining the nature of the articles reported. Information obtained personally, such as conversations, correspondence, or discussions with third parties, may not be used or reported without the explicit written permission of the source. Information obtained in a confidential and confidential manner, such as refereed manuscripts or grant applications, may not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in this.

Authorization Rights

Articles should be limited to those who have actually made a significant contribution to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of the reported research. All who have made significant contributions must be listed as co-authors. If there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they also need to be recognized or listed as contributors. Related authors are expected to ensure that all appropriate co-authors and that no inappropriate co-authors are included in the article. Further, that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the article and have approved its submission for publication.

Fundamental Errors in Published Articles

If an author later discovers any significant errors or inaccuracies in his published work, it is the author's obligation to immediately notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains significant errors, it is the author's obligation to immediately retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the veracity of the original paper.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD DUTIES

(This guide is based on the Committee on Publication Ethics best practice guide for Journal Editors)

Publication Decisions

The editors of the TeIKA Journal are responsible for deciding which articles will be processed for publication. Validation of the research output under study and its benefits for researchers and readers should always be the basis for considering these decisions. Editors may be guided by the discretion of the journal's editorial board and limited by applicable legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Equality Rule

An editor must evaluate articles for their intellectual material without distinction of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnicity, culture, nationality, or political philosophy of the author.

Principles of Confidentiality

Editors and editorial staff keep any information about a submitted manuscript confidential to anyone other than the authors, reviewers, prospective reviewers, other editorial advisors, and associated publishers.

Statement of Conflicts of Interest

Unpublished articles disclosed in submitted manuscripts may not be used in research publications by the editor without the written consent of the author. Information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. The editor should resign (i.e. must ask the co-editor, associate editor or other editorial board member to carry out the review process) from considering articles that have a conflict of interest related to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or ( possible) institutions associated with the research article. Editors must require all contributors to disclose relevant conflict of interest statements and issue corrections if conflicts of interest are revealed after publication. If necessary, other appropriate action should be taken, such as a retraction of publication or a statement of concern.

Role and Cooperation in Investigations

Editors will take immediate action when receiving ethical complaints regarding published articles that relate to the publisher (or the public). These steps will include contacting the author and giving consideration to the complaint received. A further step can be in the form of continued communication with relevant research institutions and bodies. The editor will take appropriate action such as correcting the publication, removing the article from publication, expressing concern or other records if the complaint is found to be true. which may be relevant. Any reported acts of unethical publishing behavior should be investigated, even if discovered years after publication.

 

REVIEWER TASKS

(This guide is based on the Committee on Publication Ethics best practice guide for Journal Reviewer Partners)

Contributions to Editorial Decisions

Reviewer partners assist editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving research articles. Peer review is an important component of formal scientific communication, and is at the core of the scientific method.

Disclosure

Selected reviewers who feel they are not qualified to review the accepted research article or understand that the available deadline is not possible will inform the editor and withdraw from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any article accepted for review must be treated as a confidential document. They may not be shown or discussed with others except with the permission of the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

The review process must be carried out objectively. Personal criticism of the author is not appropriate. Reviewers must express their views clearly and be accompanied by supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers must identify relevant published works that have not been cited by the authors. Each statement of observation, derivation, or argument that has been previously written must be accompanied by a statement of the relevant citation source. The reviewer will call the editor's attention for any similarities or overlaps between manuscripts under consideration for publication that the reviewer is personally aware of.

Statement of Conflict of Interest

Unpublished articles that are disclosed in articles received by the TeIKA Journal may not be used by reviewers as research articles without written permission from the author. Information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Review partners may not undertake an article review process where they have a conflict of interest resulting from a competitive, collaborative, or other relationship or connection with the author, company or institution to which the paper is related.

A Conflict of Interest (COI) occurs when there is a discrepancy between an individual's personal interests (competing interests) and his responsibilities for scientific and publishing activities so that a reasonable observer may wonder whether an individual's behavior or judgment is motivated by his or her judgment or other interests. competing. COI in publishing affects everyone with an interest in research integrity including journals, research/academic institutions, funding agencies, popular media, and the public. COI can take many forms including in relation to financial matters, academic commitments, personal relationships, political or religious beliefs, and institutional affiliations. All authors must state their COI, if any, during the submission of the research article. Reviewers are required to state their COI after they have received manuscript review. Editors must also announce their COI during manuscript handling.