kartal escort ataşehir escort ataşehir escort pendik escort ümraniye escort ataşehir escort ümraniye escort maltepe escort ataşehir escort maltepe escort nakliyat ofis taşıma istanbul evden eve nakliyat istanbul evden eve nakliyat evden eve nakliyat beylikduzu escort beylikduzu escort maltepe escort alanya escort pendik escort
The Effectiveness Of K-W-L Technique To Increase Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement Through Reading Descriptive Text For Grade 8 of SMP Negeri 1 Cisarua | Situmorang | Acuity

The Effectiveness Of K-W-L Technique To Increase Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement Through Reading Descriptive Text For Grade 8 of SMP Negeri 1 Cisarua

Nelson Balisar Panjaitan, Radema Situmorang

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to find out whether there is a significant difference in reading comprehension achievement between those who are taught using the K-W-L (Know-Want to know-Learn) technique and those who are taught using the Conventional technique. In this study, the researcher used quantitative research. The participants of this study were students at SMP Negeri 1 Cisarua, Bandung. This study was conducted in ten meetings. This research was conducted in four steps: Pilot test, Pre-test, treatment (K-W-L technique) and post-test. After analyzing the data from the result of pre-test and post-test score it showed that there is significant difference in reading comprehension between those who are taught using K-W-L technique and those who are taught using conventional technique. Therefore, it can be concluded that the K-W-L technique as a teaching material has a positive impact in reading comprehension achievement.

Key Word: K-W-L technique, Effectiveness, and Reading Comprehension.


References


Ahmad, I. S. & Asraf, R. M (2004). Making sense of text: Strategies used by good and average readers. Reading Matrix, 26-37.

Akyol, H. (2006). Türkçe öğretim yöntemleri.[Turkish teaching methods].

Ankara: KökPublication. From:http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/asraf_ahmad/article.pdf

Arikunto, S (2009). Dasar- Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi,Aksara.

Arikunto S.(2013) Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

Bader, C. (2007). KWL plus reading strategy. Retrieved on November 16, 2013

from http://hercules.gcsu. edu/~cbader/5210SPED/kwl.htm.

Bailey, D. W. (2002). KWL-plus. Unpublished manuscript, Johns Hopkins University, School of Professional Studies in Business and Education, Baltimore.

Backman,Leslie Opp &Klinglammer, Sarah (2006) Shaping The Way We Teach.

The office of English Language Programs: United States Department of

state, Washington, Dc20547, 2006. E- mailiaei@uoregon.edu.

Bos, C. S. & Vaughn, S. (2002). Strategies for Teaching Students with Learning

and Behavior Problems. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Brantmeier, C. (2002). Second language reading strategies research at the secondary and university levels: Variations, disparities and generalizability. Reading Matrix, 1-14. Retrieved on November 14, 2013, from:http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/brantmeier/article.pdf

Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: an Interactive Approach to

Language Pedagogy (2th ed). England: Longman.

Carr, E. & Ogle, D. (1987). KWL Plus: A strategy for comprehension and

summarization. Journal Reading, 30(7), 626-631.

Conner, Jennifer (2006) Advanced study of the Teaching of Secondary school

Reading . Instructional reading strateg . http : www . Indiana . edu - 1517 KWL. Htm.

Djuharie, O.S. (2010). Bahasa Inggris untuk SMA/MA. Bandung:CV. YRAMA

WIDYA.

Fraenkel, J.R. & Wallen, N.E. (2006).How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 6th ed. McGraw-Hill: New York: NY.

Gerot, Linda and Peter Wignell (1995). Making Sense of Functional Grammar

Sydney: Antipodean educational Enterprise.

Grabe, William and Stoller (2002) Fredericka L. Teaching and Researching

Reading. London: Pearson Education Longman.

Jones , Raymondc . (2007) strategies for Reading Comprehension.

htti www . reading quest . org strxat kwl.html.

Katemba, C. (2013). Anxiety Level of Indonesian Students and Its Relationship

To Academic Achievement In English. Journal of Education and Practice

Vol.4 No.27 , 2013 http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/9873/10097

Katemba, C. & Samuel (2017). Improving Student’s Reading Comprehension

Ability Using Jigsaw 1 Technique. Acuity: Journal of English Language

Pedagogy, Literature and Culture. Vol. 2, No. 2 Universitas Advent

Indonesia. http://jurnal.unai.edu/index.php/acuity/article/view/613/468

Nehemiah, (2011). Role of English as a Tool for Communication in Tamil

Society. Retrieved on October 11, 2013 from

http://www.languageinindia.com/aug2009/santhienglish.html

Ogle, D. (1986). KWL: A teaching model that develops active reading in

expository text. The Reading Instructor, 39(6), 564-570.

Oxford, R.& Crookall, D.(1989). Research on language learning strategies: Methods, findings, and instructional issues. Modern Language Journal, 73, 404-419.

Pardo, L. S. (2004). What every teacher needs to know about comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58(3) 272-281.

Philip, A. (2010). The effectiveness of kwl (know, want to learn, learned) in

teaching of reading viewed from students’ English learning interest

(an experimental research in the ninth grade students of SMP negeri 8 Probolinggo academic year 2009-2010) (Unpublished thesis). English Education Department Sebelas Maret University of Surakarta, Surakarta.

Russeffendi ET., (1998) Statistika Dasar untuk PENELITIAN Pendidikan,

Bandung, IKIP 19539-9. Sa

Russeffendi ET., (2010). Dasar-dasar Penelitian Pendidikan & Bidang Non-

Eksakta Lainnya. Tarsito: Bandung.

Sasson, D. (2008). Use K-W-L Technique in Reading Lessons. Retrieved on November 8, 2013 from: http://suite101.com/a/strategic-lesson-planning- for- teaching-reading-a60272.

Sasson, D. (2007). How to teach Reading Strategies. Retrieved on October 8,

, from http://www.suite 101.com/content/how-to-tech-reading strategiesa17034.

Sinurat, V. M. (2011). Pengaruh pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD (Student

Teams Achievement Division) terhadap peningkatan kemampuan bahasa

garis singgung lingkaran. Skripsi Bandung: UNAI

Steven (2009), teaching reading comprehension. Retrieved on November 20,

from:http://www.readingresource.net/teachingreadingcomprehension.html

Sudarwati, T.M & Grace, E. (2007). Look Ahead: An English Course for Senior

High School Students Year XI. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Sudarwati and Eudia Grace. Look Ahead 2. 2005. Penerbit Erlangga. Jakarta.

Sugiono, Dr (2010). Metode penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D, penerbit Alfabeta.

Sopiyudin, D. (2009). Statistik Untuk Kedokteran Dan Kesehatan. Jakarta :

Salemba Medika.

Surapranata, Sumarna. 2009. Analisis, Validitas, Reliabilitas, Dan Interpretasi

Hasil Tes. Cetakan keempat. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Uyanto, S. S. (2009). Pedoman Analysis Data dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Graha

Ilmu.

Vacca, R.T & Vacca, J.A.L. (2008). Content Area Reading (Ninth Edition):

Literacy and Learning across the Curriculum. New York: Pearson

Education, Inc.

Yeselson, (2000). Common Reading Comprehension Problems and Basic

Exercise. Retrieved on October 8, 2013.

from:http://docs.goole.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:obIYQpAt1hoJ:plangere .rutgers.edu/documents/tutors/commonreadingcomprehentionproblems.pdf


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.