Responses to an EIL-oriented General English Course: Views of Internal and External Stakeholders

Authors

  • Şakire Erbay Çetinkaya Trabzon University
  • Prof. Karadeniz Technical University

https://doi.org/10.35974/acuity.v9i2.3075

Keywords:

EIL, English language course evaluation, Turkey, ELT, TEIL

Abstract

Teaching English as an International Language (TEIL) refers to teaching English as a truly international medium via exposing learners to diversity, adopting a broad culture view, fostering sensitivity and responsibility, being sensitive to local culture of learning, and equipping learners with communication strategies. To put this lately popular paradigm into actual teaching practice, a 10-week EIL-oriented General English course was devised for 53 English-majoring preparatory programme students at a public Turkish university as a part of a PhD study. The current report, as the qualitative part of that quasi-experimental PhD study, intended to evaluate the course with all its possible strengths, weaknesses, and ways to improve it for better future use based on both insider and outsider responses. While the data from internal stakeholders (N=25) were drawn from individual retrospective interviews, weekly written self-reports and a final open-ended questionnaire, the data from external ones (N=2) were gathered from peer classroom observation. The course appears to be a valuable experience as it increased learners’ world knowledge, enhanced their oral production in English, and provided an enjoyable and motivating atmosphere yet with some limitations regarding course content, materials and instructional choices. It is hoped that drawing such a field-tested picture will inspire others to make instructional decisions in line with the changing sociolinguistic landscape of English.

Article Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Şakire Erbay Çetinkaya, Trabzon University

Asst. Prof. Şakire Erbay Çetinkaya, holding an MA and PhD degree in Applied Linguistics from Karadeniz Technical University, has been offering BA-level courses at teh English Language Teaching department of Trabzon University. Her interest areas cover Teaching English as an International Languages (TEIL), (inter)cultural development, instructional materials evaluation and design, reflective practice, research-related writing, and academic writing instruction.

Prof., Karadeniz Technical University

Prof. Dr. Mustafa Naci Kayaoğlu holds a PhD from the University of Bristol. He is the author of Language Learning Strategies: Theory, Practice and Issues (2011) and co-author of Music, Language and Second Language Acquisition. He is the coordinator of the Applied Linguistics Graduate Programme (MA-PhD) at Karadeniz Technical University, where he has been offering BA, MA and PhD courses. 

 

References

Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence in ELT. ELT Journal, 56 (1), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.1.57

Bayyurt, Y., & Altınmakas, D. (2012). A WE-based English communication skills course at a Turkish university. In A. Matsuda (Ed.), Principles and practices of teaching English as an international language (pp. 169-182). Multilingual Matters.

Bektaş-Çetinkaya, Y. (2012). Teaching English as an international language and its reflections in Turkey. International Journal of Human Sciences, 9 (2), 378-391. https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/1665

Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (5th ed.). Pearson.

Boonsuk, Y., Ambele, E. A., & McKinley, J. (2021). Developing awareness of global Englishes: Moving away from ‘native standards’ for Thai university ELT. System, 99, 102511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102511

Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Butar Butar, E., & Katemba, C. (2023). EFL Students’ Perceptions Toward Vocabulary Learning by Listening to English Songs on Spotify. Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 6(1), 194-205.

Çakır, İ., & Baytar, B. (2014). Foreign language learners’ view on the importance of learning the target language pronunciation. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 10 (1), 99-110.

Cates, K. A. (1990). Teaching for a better world: Global issues and language education. The Language Teacher, XIV (5), 41-52.

Çelik, M. (2008). A description of Turkish-English phonology for teaching English in Turkey. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 4 (1), 159-174.

Cohen, Louis, Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

D’Angelo, J. (2012). WE-informed EIL curriculum at Chukyo: Towards a functional, educated, multilingual outcome. In A. Matsuda (Ed.), Principles and practices of teaching English as an international language (pp. 121-139). Multilingual Matters.

Dogancay-Aktuna, S., & Hardman, J. (2018). Teaching of English as an international language in various contexts: Nothing is as practical as good theory. RELC Journal, 49(1), 74-87.

Doğançay-Aktuna, S. (1998). The spread of English in Turkey and its current sociolinguistic profile. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 19 (1), 24-39.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.

Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw Hill.

Galloway, N. (2013). Global Englishes and English language teaching (ELT)-bridging the gap between theory and practice in a Japanese context. System, 41, 786-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.019

Graddol, D. (2006). English next. British Council.

Guerra, L. S. P. (2005). Teaching and learning English as an international language in Portugal: Policy, practice and perceptions [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Warwick.

Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Newbury House Publishers.

Hino, N. (2012a). Endonormative Models of EIL for the Expanding Circle. In A. Matsuda (Ed), Principles and Practices of Teaching English as an International Language (pp. 28-43). Multilingual Matters.

Hino, N. (2012b). Participating in the community of EIL users through real-time news: Integrated practice in teaching English as an international language (IPTEIL). In A. Matsuda (Ed.), Principles and practices of teaching English as an international language (pp. 183-200). Multilingual Matters.

Jindapitak, N., Teo, A., & Savski, K. (2022). Bringing global Englishes to the ELT classroom: English language learners’ reflections. Asian Englishes, 24(3), 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2022.2033910

Katemba C.,V., Tobing J.,H.,L., & Putri A.,T. (2022), Do Kahoot! Games Enhance Vocabulary Learning? Journal of Elementary Education, Vol 15 No 3 (2022): 393-408. https://doi.org/10.18690/rei.15.3.393-408.2022

Katemba, C., & Sinuhaji, G. (2021). Can ESA Method Through Quizizz Games Enhance Vocabulary Knowledge? International Journal of Game-Based Learning (IJGBL), Vol. 11 no. 3. DOI: 10.4018/IJGBL.2021070102

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.

Lee, H. (2012). World Englishes in a high school English class: A case from Japan. In A. Matsuda (Ed.), Principles and practices of teaching English as an international language (pp. 154-168). Multilingual Matters.

Mamoru, M. (2009). Japanese English for EIAL: What it should be like and how much has been introduced. In K. Murata & J. Jenkins (Eds.), Global Englishes in Asian contexts: Current and future debates (pp. 73-93). Palgrave Macmillan.

Marlina, R. (2013). Globalisation, internationalisation, and language education: An academic program for global citizens. Multilingual Education, 3 (5), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-5059-3-5

Mason, J. (2010). The effects of different types of materials on the intercultural competence of Tunisian university students. In B. Tomlinson & H. Masuhara (Eds.), Research for materials development in language learning: Evidence for best practice (pp. 67-82). Continuum.

Matsuda, A. (2019). World Englishes in English language teaching: Kachru's six fallacies and the TEIL paradigm. World Englishes, 38(1-2), 144-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12368

Matsuda, A. (2018). Is teaching English as an international language all about being politically correct?. RELC Journal, 49(1), 24-35.

Matsuda, A. (2012). Teaching materials in EIL. In L. Alsagoff, S. L. McKay, G. Hu, & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Principles and practices for teaching English as an international language (pp. 168-185). Routledge.

Matsuda, A., & Friedrich, P. (2011). English as an international language: A curriculum blueprint. World Englishes, 30 (3), 332-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2011.01717.x

McKay, S. L. (2009). Pragmatics and EIL pedagogy. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), English as an international language: Perspectives and pedagogical issues (pp. 227-241). Multilingual Matters.

McKay, S. L. (2012). Principles of teaching English as an international language. In L. Alsagoff, S. L. McKay, G. Hu, & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Principles and practices for teaching English as an international language (pp. 28-46). Routledge.

Mckinley, J., & Thompson, G. (2018). Washback effect in teaching English as an international language. In J. I. Liontas, M. DelliCarpini, & S. Abrar-ul-Hassan (Eds.), TESOL encyclopaedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–12). John Wiley.

Mitchell, K. (2012). A social tool: Why and how ESOL students use Facebook. CALICO Journal, 29 (3), 471-493. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/calicojournal.29.3.471

Rose, H., Syrbe, M., Montakantiwong, A., & Funada, N. (2020). Global TESOL for the 21st century: Teaching English in a changing world. Multilingual Matters.

Rose, H., & Montakantiwong, A. (2018). A tale of two teachers: A duoethnography of the realistic and idealistic successes and failures of teaching English as an international language. RELC Journal, 49(1), 88-101.

Sadeghpour, M., & Sharifian, F. (2019). World Englishes in English language teaching. World Englishes, 38(1-2), 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12372

Sharifian, F., & Marlina, R. (2012). English as an international language (EIL): An innovative academic program. In A. Matsuda (Ed.), Principles and practices of teaching English as an international language (pp. 140-153). Multilingual Matters.

Smith, L. E. (2009). Dimensions of understanding in cross-cultural communication. In K. Murata & J. Jenkins (Eds.), Global Englishes in Asian contexts: Current and future debates (pp. 17-25). Palgrave Macmillan.

Sung, C. C. M. (2018). Out-of-class communication and awareness of English as a lingua franca. ELT Journal, 72(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx024

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-11

How to Cite

[1]
Şakire Erbay Çetinkaya and M. N. Kayaoğlu, “Responses to an EIL-oriented General English Course: Views of Internal and External Stakeholders”, JELPEDLIC, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 136-160, Jun. 2024.