The Effectiveness Of K-W-L Technique To Increase Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement Through Reading Descriptive Text For Grade 8 of SMP Negeri 1 Cisarua
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to find out whether there is a significant difference in reading comprehension achievement between those who are taught using the K-W-L (Know-Want to know-Learn) technique and those who are taught using the Conventional technique. In this study, the researcher used quantitative research. The participants of this study were students at SMP Negeri 1 Cisarua, Bandung. This study was conducted in ten meetings. This research was conducted in four steps: Pilot test, Pre-test, treatment (K-W-L technique) and post-test. After analyzing the data from the result of pre-test and post-test score it showed that there is significant difference in reading comprehension between those who are taught using K-W-L technique and those who are taught using conventional technique. Therefore, it can be concluded that the K-W-L technique as a teaching material has a positive impact in reading comprehension achievement.
Key Word: K-W-L technique, Effectiveness, and Reading Comprehension.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, I. S. & Asraf, R. M (2004). Making sense of text: Strategies used by good and average readers. Reading Matrix, 26-37.
Akyol, H. (2006). Türkçe öğretim yöntemleri.[Turkish teaching methods].
Ankara: KökPublication. From:http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/asraf_ahmad/article.pdf
Arikunto, S (2009). Dasar- Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi,Aksara.
Arikunto S.(2013) Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
Bader, C. (2007). KWL plus reading strategy. Retrieved on November 16, 2013
from http://hercules.gcsu. edu/~cbader/5210SPED/kwl.htm.
Bailey, D. W. (2002). KWL-plus. Unpublished manuscript, Johns Hopkins University, School of Professional Studies in Business and Education, Baltimore.
Backman,Leslie Opp &Klinglammer, Sarah (2006) Shaping The Way We Teach.
The office of English Language Programs: United States Department of
state, Washington, Dc20547, 2006. E- mailiaei@uoregon.edu.
Bos, C. S. & Vaughn, S. (2002). Strategies for Teaching Students with Learning
and Behavior Problems. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Brantmeier, C. (2002). Second language reading strategies research at the secondary and university levels: Variations, disparities and generalizability. Reading Matrix, 1-14. Retrieved on November 14, 2013, from:http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/brantmeier/article.pdf
Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: an Interactive Approach to
Language Pedagogy (2th ed). England: Longman.
Carr, E. & Ogle, D. (1987). KWL Plus: A strategy for comprehension and
summarization. Journal Reading, 30(7), 626-631.
Conner, Jennifer (2006) Advanced study of the Teaching of Secondary school
Reading . Instructional reading strateg . http : www . Indiana . edu - 1517 KWL. Htm.
Djuharie, O.S. (2010). Bahasa Inggris untuk SMA/MA. Bandung:CV. YRAMA
WIDYA.
Fraenkel, J.R. & Wallen, N.E. (2006).How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 6th ed. McGraw-Hill: New York: NY.
Gerot, Linda and Peter Wignell (1995). Making Sense of Functional Grammar
Sydney: Antipodean educational Enterprise.
Grabe, William and Stoller (2002) Fredericka L. Teaching and Researching
Reading. London: Pearson Education Longman.
Jones , Raymondc . (2007) strategies for Reading Comprehension.
htti www . reading quest . org strxat kwl.html.
Katemba, C. (2013). Anxiety Level of Indonesian Students and Its Relationship
To Academic Achievement In English. Journal of Education and Practice
Vol.4 No.27 , 2013 http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/9873/10097
Katemba, C. & Samuel (2017). Improving Student’s Reading Comprehension
Ability Using Jigsaw 1 Technique. Acuity: Journal of English Language
Pedagogy, Literature and Culture. Vol. 2, No. 2 Universitas Advent
Indonesia. http://jurnal.unai.edu/index.php/acuity/article/view/613/468
Nehemiah, (2011). Role of English as a Tool for Communication in Tamil
Society. Retrieved on October 11, 2013 from
http://www.languageinindia.com/aug2009/santhienglish.html
Ogle, D. (1986). KWL: A teaching model that develops active reading in
expository text. The Reading Instructor, 39(6), 564-570.
Oxford, R.& Crookall, D.(1989). Research on language learning strategies: Methods, findings, and instructional issues. Modern Language Journal, 73, 404-419.
Pardo, L. S. (2004). What every teacher needs to know about comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58(3) 272-281.
Philip, A. (2010). The effectiveness of kwl (know, want to learn, learned) in
teaching of reading viewed from students’ English learning interest
(an experimental research in the ninth grade students of SMP negeri 8 Probolinggo academic year 2009-2010) (Unpublished thesis). English Education Department Sebelas Maret University of Surakarta, Surakarta.
Russeffendi ET., (1998) Statistika Dasar untuk PENELITIAN Pendidikan,
Bandung, IKIP 19539-9. Sa
Russeffendi ET., (2010). Dasar-dasar Penelitian Pendidikan & Bidang Non-
Eksakta Lainnya. Tarsito: Bandung.
Sasson, D. (2008). Use K-W-L Technique in Reading Lessons. Retrieved on November 8, 2013 from: http://suite101.com/a/strategic-lesson-planning- for- teaching-reading-a60272.
Sasson, D. (2007). How to teach Reading Strategies. Retrieved on October 8,
, from http://www.suite 101.com/content/how-to-tech-reading strategiesa17034.
Sinurat, V. M. (2011). Pengaruh pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD (Student
Teams Achievement Division) terhadap peningkatan kemampuan bahasa
garis singgung lingkaran. Skripsi Bandung: UNAI
Steven (2009), teaching reading comprehension. Retrieved on November 20,
from:http://www.readingresource.net/teachingreadingcomprehension.html
Sudarwati, T.M & Grace, E. (2007). Look Ahead: An English Course for Senior
High School Students Year XI. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Sudarwati and Eudia Grace. Look Ahead 2. 2005. Penerbit Erlangga. Jakarta.
Sugiono, Dr (2010). Metode penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D, penerbit Alfabeta.
Sopiyudin, D. (2009). Statistik Untuk Kedokteran Dan Kesehatan. Jakarta :
Salemba Medika.
Surapranata, Sumarna. 2009. Analisis, Validitas, Reliabilitas, Dan Interpretasi
Hasil Tes. Cetakan keempat. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
Uyanto, S. S. (2009). Pedoman Analysis Data dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Graha
Ilmu.
Vacca, R.T & Vacca, J.A.L. (2008). Content Area Reading (Ninth Edition):
Literacy and Learning across the Curriculum. New York: Pearson
Education, Inc.
Yeselson, (2000). Common Reading Comprehension Problems and Basic
Exercise. Retrieved on October 8, 2013.
from:http://docs.goole.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:obIYQpAt1hoJ:plangere .rutgers.edu/documents/tutors/commonreadingcomprehentionproblems.pdf
