Unearthing the Traces of CEFR’s Mediation in EFL Textbook

Authors

  • Emrah Cinkara Gaziantep University
  • Havva Ciğdem Kurt

https://doi.org/10.35974/acuity.v10i1.3040

Keywords:

Mediation, the CEFR/CV, EFL Textbook, EFL Learning

Abstract

The main aim of the present study is to reveal the relationship between a 4th grade EFL textbook used in Turkey and the mediation notion that is given a place in Companion Volume to the CEFR (CEFR/CV) in 2018. Deductive thematic content analysis method of qualitative research including usage of techniques such as re-reading and taking notes was conducted to analyse the data coming from data collection process. Textbook activities were unpacked and coded under themes that were determined beforehand. Then, illustrative descriptors for mediation from the CEFR/CV were extracted and coded as well. Mediator activities found in the textbook and illustrative descriptors of mediation were comparatively analysed to reveal the extent of their match. Themes were created out of the illustrative descriptors for mediation from the CEFR/CV, and textbook activities were unpacked and categorised in the light of these themes with their IDs that were determined before. Finally, a second opinion on the themes, categorizations and coding processes is received from an expert in the field. Descriptive analysis was utilized to display the relationship between the textbook and mediation characteristics in the CEFR/CV. The results show that most of the textbook activities do not reflect the characteristics of mediation mentioned in the CEFR/CV. There were 14 mediator activities out of 168 activities that indicate mediation, which constitutes 8,3% of the textbook. There were also other mediators found in the textbook such as visual and audial aids.

Article Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bardakçı, M. (2011). Teaching young learners English through language teaching materials. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 6(2), 289-295. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/186738

Bekleyen, N. (2011). Can I Teach English to Children? Turkish Preservice Teacher Candidates and Very Young Learners. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 32, 256-265. doi:10.1080/10901027.2011.594700

Bowen, G. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. doi:DOI: 10.3316/QRJ0902027

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Calabrese, R., & Dawes, B. (2008). EARLY LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHER TRAINING: A FOREIGN LANGUAGE SYLLABUS FOR PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS. Studi di Glottodidattica, 1, 32-53.

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297-298. doi:10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

Council of Europe. (2001). COMMON EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK OF REFERENCE FOR LANGUAGES: LEARNING, TEACHING, ASSESSMENT. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Council of Europe. (2018). COMMON EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK OF REFERENCE FOR LANGUAGES: LEARNING, TEACHING, ASSESSMENT: COMPANION VOLUME WITH NEW DESCRIPTORS. Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Damar , E. A., Gürsoy, E., & Korkmaz, Ş. Ç. (2013). Teaching English to Young Learners: Through the Eyes of EFL Teacher Trainers. ELT Research Journal, 2(3), 95-110.

Gay, L. R., Mills , G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH: Competencies for Analysis and Applications (10th ed.). The USA: Pearson. Retrieved from https://yuli-elearning.com/pluginfile.php/4831/mod_resource/content/1/Gay-E%20Book%20Educational%20Research-2012.pdf

Haznedar, B. (2010). Türkiye’de Yabancı Dil Eğitimi: Reformlar, Yönelimler ve Öğretmenlerimiz. International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 11, pp. 747-755. Antalya. Retrieved from https://docplayer.biz.tr/488690-Turkiye-de-yabanci-dil-egitimi-reformlar-yonelimler-ve-ogretmenlerimiz.html

İnceçay, G. (2012). Turkey’s foreign language policy at primary level: Challenges in practice. ELT Research Journal, 53-62. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/eltrj/issue/5473/74355

Işık, A. (2008). YABANCI DİL EĞİTİMİMİZDEKİ YANLIŞLAR NEREDEN KAYNAKLANIYOR? Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 4(2), 15-26. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jlls/issue/9929/122850

Kırkgöz, Y. (2008). A case study of teachers’ implementation of curriculum innovation in English language teaching in Turkish primary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1859–1875. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.007

Kırkgöz, Y. (2009, September). Globalization and English Language Policy in Turkey. Educational Policy, 23(5), 663-684. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904808316319

Krashen, S. (2009). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Retrieved from http://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/principles_and_practice.pdf

Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2018). İNGİLİZCE DERSİ ÖĞRETİM PROGRAMI (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar. Ankara: T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.

North, B. (2016). Developing CEFR illustrative descriptors of aspects of mediation. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 3(2), 132-140. Retrieved from http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/125/131

North, B., & Piccardo, E. (2016a). Developing illustrative descriptors of aspects of mediation for the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR). Language Teaching, 49(3), 455-459. doi:10.1017/S0261444816000100

Oktay, A. (2015). Foreign language teaching : A problem in Turkish education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 584-593. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.587

Özer, B., & Korkmaz, C. (2016). YABANCI DİL ÖĞRETİMİNDE ÖĞRENCİ BAŞARISINI ETKİLEYEN UNSURLAR. EKEV AKADEMİ DERGİSİ, 20(67), 59-84. Retrieved from http://www.ekevakademi.org/Makaleler/2088628658_03%20Bayram%20OZER-Celalettin%20KORKMAZ.pdf

Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to Identify Themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85-109. doi:10.1177/1525822X02239569

Saricoban, G. (2012). Foreign language education policies in turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2643 – 2648. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.539

Stec, M. D. (2011). Early language teaching and syllabuses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1123-1132. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.346

Tan, F. (2019). İlkokul İngilizce Ders Kitabı 4. Ankara, Turkey: FCM Yayıncılık. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rDjoayN22rbAFBuGzpGE0UyOTz9GDkZj/view

Zorba, M., & Arıkan, A. (2016). A Study Of Anatolian High Schools’ 9th Grade English Language Curriculum In Relation To The CEFR. Uşak Üniversitesi Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 13-24. doi:https://doi.org/10.29065/usakead.232436

Downloads

Published

2024-12-29

How to Cite

[1]
E. Cinkara and H. C. Kurt, “Unearthing the Traces of CEFR’s Mediation in EFL Textbook”, JELPEDLIC, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 40-71, Dec. 2024.