Comparative Study: Enhancing Students’ Reading Comprehension Ability through Ing Ngarsa Sung Tuladha and Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Learning Models

Authors

  • Ezra Novianty Pandiangan Tiga Penuai Montessori Preschool

https://doi.org/10.35974/acuity.v4i1.672

Abstract

Cooperative learning is considered to be effective to enhance students’ English skills. This study utilizes two learning models under cooperative learning: Ing Ngarsa Sung Tuladha and Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD). This study aims to find out whether there is a significant difference between those two learning models in enhancing students’ reading comprehension ability. The instrument of this study is the reading test which was piloted before distributing it to the actual respondents. The results of this study show that after comparing the two learning models, there is a significant difference in students' reading comprehension ability. Additionally, in this study, the author seeks respondents' response towards both learning models and it is found that the respondents' response falls under really like category; which means, they really like the two learnings models to be utilized in the classroom to enhance their reading comprehension ability.

Keywords: Reading Comprehension Ability, Ing Ngarsa Sung Tuladha, STAD, Cooperative

Learning models.

Article Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Munawwarah, S. (2013). The Implementation of Cooperative Learning, Student Teams- Achievement Divisions Technique in Teaching Reading Comprehension. Journal of English and Education, 82-83, 1(2).

Assaly, I. R. & Smadi, O. M. (2015). Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to evaluate the cognitive levels of master class textbooks' questions. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 100- 101.

Djamal et.al. (2006). Improving reading skill in English. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Duke, N.K. & Pearson, P. (2001). Reading Comprehension: Strategies that work.

Juliana (2018). The Comparative Impacts of Using Lexical Glossing and Interference Strategies on Students’ Reading Comprehension. Advances in Language and Literacy Studies, 1, 9 (1)

Katemba, C., V.; Sitompul, N., A., 2018 A Comparison of Using Diglot Weave Technique and Student Team Achievement Division on Student Vocabulary Achievement. Human Behaviour, Development, and Society. Vol 17 (2018): April 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hbds/article/view/188983

Katemba, C., V., & Samuel (2017). Improving Student’s Reading Comprehension Ability Using Jigsaw 1 Technique. Acuity: Journal of English Language Pedagogy, Literature and

Culture Vol 2 No.2 2017. Retrieved from: http://jurnal.unai.edu/index.php/acuity/article/view/613/468

Karaçöp, A. (2016). Effects of Student Teams-Achievement Divisions Cooperative Learning with Models on Students’ Understanding of Electrochemical Cells. International education

Khan G. N. & Inamullah, H. M. (2011). Effect of Student’s Team Achievement Division (STAD) on Academic Achievement of Students. Canadian Centre of Science and Education, 211-212, 7(12).

Khusniyah, N. & Lustyantie, N (2017). Improving English Reading Comprehension Ability Through Survey, Questions, Read, Record, Recite, Review Strategy (SQ4R). English language teaching, 202-203, 10 (12).

Lalihatu, D. (2012). Skripsi. UNAI.

Lestari, D. (2014). Wh-question in teaching narrative reading comprehension to junior high

school students. e-journal.

Lestari, K.E. & Yudhanegara, M.R. (2017). Penelitian Pendidikan matematika. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama

Mikulecky, B. S. (1990). A Short Course in Teaching Reading Skills. United States of AmericaL Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.

Mujito, W (2014). Reading and thinking in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mustaqim, A. (2006). Pendidikan Humanisme Ki Hajar Dewantara.

Nurie, Y. (2017). Pedagogical Practices in teaching reading Comprehension: A Case Study of Three EFL Teachers in a Secondary School in Ethiopia. PASAA, 109, 54

Qomaruzzaman, B. (2011). Memimpin Diri dan Meraih Prestasi. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

Rubin, D. (1985). Reading and Learning Power. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Sase, A. S. (2014). The relationship between Prior Knowledge and Reading Comprehension. Advances in Language and Literary Studies. 5 (6).

Siagian, S., W., & Katemba, C., V., (2016). Comparative Study Between Think Aloud and

Visual Imagery in Enhancing Students’ Reading Comprehension. Acuity Journal of

English Language Pedagogy, Literature and Culture Vol1 no.1 2016. Retrieved from:

http://jurnal.unai.edu/index.php/acuity/article/view/602

Steinmeyer, O. (1995). Classic Problems: Classic Solution. In Challenges of Reading the New and the old (pp.154-155). Kuala Lumpur: Maclals

Suyono, H. (2007). Social Intelligence. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Tiantong, M. & Temuangsai, S. (2013). Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) Technique through the Moodle to Enhance Learning Achievement. International Education Studies, 6(4), 86

Usniyah and Lustyantie (2017). Improving English Reading Comprehension Ability Through Survey, Questions, Read, Record, Recite, Review Strategy (SQ4R). English Language Teaching

Wartono. (2013). Kepemimpinan: Teori, Psikologi, Perilaku Organisasi, Aplikasi dan Penelitian. Ed. 11 Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Wyk, M. M. (2012). The Effects of the STAD-Cooperative Learning Method on Student

Achievement, Attitude, and Motivation in Economics Education. J Soc Sci, 262,33(2).

Yusuf, Natsir, and Hanum (2015). A Teacher's Experience in Teaching with Student Teams- Achievement Division (STAD) Technique. International Journal of Instruction, 8 (2), 100-102

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
E. N. Pandiangan, “Comparative Study: Enhancing Students’ Reading Comprehension Ability through Ing Ngarsa Sung Tuladha and Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Learning Models”, JELPEDLIC, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-9, Feb. 2019.