Mentoring Style, Self-Description, and Academic Achievement in English Class


  • Ate Gueen Simanungkalit Universitas Klabat
  • Joppi Jacobus Rondonuwu Universitas Klabat


mentoring style, self-description, academic achievement


The intention of the study was to examine student mentoring, self-description, and academic achievement in a selected private university in Jakarta, Indonesia. There were 150 respondents in the study. The 2 instruments used for collecting data were adopted from Cohen (1995) for identifying the mentoring style of the mentors of the students, and from Marsh (1999) for identifying self-description of the students. The analysis of data employed descriptive statistics (independent t-test) as well as Chisquare, One-way ANOVA, and Two-way ANOVA. The research inquiries focused on the following issues: (1) identifying the mentoring style, self-description, and academic achievement of the students; (2) the relationship of mentoring style, self-description, academic achievement, and demographic profiles; and (3) the interactive effects—individual and joint—of mentoring style, self-description, and student academic achievement.  The findings of the study showed that 2 mentoring styles were predominant among their mentors: relationship emphasis and mentor model; students perceived themselves with a self-description focused on spiritual values; and students had high academic performance. Both male and female students perceived similar mentoring styles among their mentors, while, 1st year and 2nd year students perceived mentoring style to be different among their mentors. In self-description, differences were found between genders while there was no difference found between 1st and 2nd year students. There was no difference found between gender and year of study in the academic achievement, the students showed high performance. Mentoring style and self-description did not have a significant individual or joint difference on academic achievement. Since the students, as a whole had high academic achievement, this study seemed to suggest that the different mentoring style did not have a difference on their academic achievement. However, that did not mean that mentoring did not work. On the contrary, it seemed that mentoring, regardless of style—based on the high academic achievement scores—did work. However, there was also the possibility that high achieving students might not need mentoring for improving their academic achievement.

Article Metrics


Download data is not yet available.



Flynn, P. (1995). Global competition and education: Another sputnik? The Social Studies, 86(2), 53-55. DOI: pdf/10.1080/00377996.1995.9958370

Asiaweek. (2000). Asia’s best universities 2000: Overall ranking. Retrieved from

Cleary, T. S. (2001). Indicators of quality. Retrieved from /downloads /portfolio/SCUP-TOC-Assessment-Quality.pdf

Anderson, E. M., & Shannon, A. L. (1988). Toward a conceptualization of mentoring. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 38-42.

Cohen, N. H. (1995). Mentoring adult learners: A guide for educators and trainers. Malabar, FL: Krieger.

Foster, L. (2001, March). Effectiveness of mentor programs: Review of literature from 1995 to 2000. Retrieved from

Otto, P. E. (1999). Mentors and mentoring: A classic concept comes of age. Retrieved from

Brewster, C., & Fager, J. (1998). Student mentoring. Retrieved from Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory’s Information Service Web site

Reasoner, R. (n.d.). What is self-esteem? Retrieved from International Council for Self-Esteem Web site: /content/1-what_is.htm.

Strein, W. (1995). Assessment of self-concept. ERIC Identifier: ED389962. Retrieved from

Zahra, A. T, Arif, M., & Yousuf, M. I. (2010). Relationship of academic, physical, and social self-concepts of students with their academic achievement. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 3(3), 73-78. Retrieved from


Marsh, H. W., Craven, R., & Debus, R. (1999). Separation of competence and affect components of multiple dimensions of academic self-concept: A developmental perspective. Retrieved from .au/99pap/deb99416.htm

Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441.

Snow, R. E., Corno, L., & Jackson III, D. (1996). Individual differences in affective and conative functions. In D. C. Berliner, & R. C. Calfee (E.Ds.), Handbook of educational psychology. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

Tracey, D. K. (2002). Self-concepts of preadolescents with mild intellectual disability: Multidimensionality, measurement, and support for the big fish little pond effect. Retrieved from

Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual. Berkhire, England: McGraw-Hill.

Engels, E.A. Schmid, C.H., Terrin, N., Olkin, I., & Lau, J. (1999). Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: An empirical study of 125 meta-analyses. A technical report, Department of Statistics, Stanford, California. Retrieved from

Campbell, T., & Campbell, D. (1997). Faculty/student mentor program: Effects on academic performance and retention. Research in Higher Education, 38(6), 727-742. DOI: 10.1023/A:1024911904627

Lechuga, V. (2011). Faculty-graduate student mentoring relationships: Mentors’ perceived roles and responsibilities. Higher Education, 62(6), 757-771. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-011-9416-0

Santos, S. J., & Reigadas, E. T. (2005). Understanding the student-faculty mentoring process: Its effects on at-risk university students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, and Practice, 6(3), 337-357. Retrieved from


Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education

(5th ed; international edition). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

Sorrentino, D. M. (2006). The SEEK mentoring program: An application of the goal-setting theory. Journal of College Student Retention, 8(2), 241-250. Retrieved from _SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ744662

Additional Files



How to Cite

A. G. Simanungkalit and J. J. Rondonuwu, “Mentoring Style, Self-Description, and Academic Achievement in English Class”, JELPEDLIC, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-11, Jan. 2020.