English Education Master Students' Perceptions on Metacognitive Strategy in Academic Reading

Authors

  • Kristian Wijaya Sanata Dharma University

https://doi.org/10.35974/acuity.v7i2.2696

Keywords:

Metacognitive strategy, academic reading, students' perceptions

Abstract

Abstract

Metacognitive strategy can bring about varied fruitful influential impacts toward academic reading enterprises endured by graduate university EFL learners. In this present small-scale qualitative study, the researcher aimed to profoundly investigate English Education Master Students’ perceptions on metacognitive strategy in academic reading. To achieve this research objectivity, this study employed a qualitative content analysis method to obtain more specific portrayals out of the gathered data. 10 online Likert-scale questionnaire items were distributed to 18 English Education Master Students, batch 2019, Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta. After obtaining the intended data from this first research instrument, the researcher also planned to make use of 5 open-ended written narrative inquiry questions to be responded to by 3 randomly selected interviewees derived from similar research samplings. Two major-specific themes were revealed namely: (1) Metacognitive strategy has successfully promoted more positive academic reading behaviors and (2) Metacognitive strategy allowed graduate university EFL learners to achieve more fruitful academic reading outcomes. The main conclusion of these aforementioned findings is the internalization of metacognitive strategy at the beginning of academic reading dynamics is indispensably crucial in which graduate university EFL learners can potentially transform into more mature, strategic, critical, and proficient L2 academic readers.

Keywords: Metacognitive strategy, academic reading, students’ perceptions

 

Article Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

REFERENCES

Al Nazhari, H., Delfi, S., & K, S. (2016). A study on English reading habits of students of English Study Program of Riau University. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Riau, 3(2), 1–8. https://jom.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFKIP/article/view/10027

Andriani, E., & Mbato, C. L. (2021). Male and female Indonesian EFL undergraduate students’ metacognitive strategies in academic reading: planning, monitoring and evaluation strategies. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 11(2), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v11i2.3006

Anjomshoaa, L., Golestan, S., & Anjomshoaa, A. (2012). The influences of metacognitive awareness on reading comprehension in iranian English undergraduate students in Kerman, Iran. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 1(6), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.6p.193

Baum, J., Frömer, R., & Rahman, R. A. (n.d.). Emotions and cognitive effort – but not source credibility – determine news-based social judgments. Preprint, 1–25.

Bria, M. G., & Mbato, C. L. (2019). Metacognitive strategies of undergraduate and postgraduate students in reading. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 22(2), 182-197.

Clandinin, D. J., & Caine, V. (2013). Narrative inquiry. Reviewing Qualitative Research in the Social Sciences, 166–179. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813324-13

Conrady, K. (2015). Modeling Metacognition: Making Thinking Visible in a Content Course for Teachers. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 4(2), 132. https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.2015.1422

Dardjito, H. (2019). Students’ metacognitive reading awareness and academic English reading comprehension in EFL context. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 611–624. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12439a

Dilek, C. (2017). An Overview of Metacognitive Strategies in Reading Comprehension Skill. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 57, 1–17. http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/

Djudin, T. (2017). Using Metacognitive Strategies to Improve Reading Comprehension and Solve a Word Problem. JETL (Journal Of Education, Teaching and Learning), 2(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v2i1.151

Dodick, D., Starling, A. J., Wethe, J., Pang, Y., Messner, L. V., Smith, C., Master, C. L., Halker-Singh, R. B., Vargas, B. B., Bogle, J. M., Mandrekar, J., Talaber, A., & Leong, D. (2017). The Effect of In-School Saccadic Training on Reading Fluency and Comprehension in First and Second Grade Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Child Neurology, 32(1), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073816668704

Eda Ceylan, L. H. (2015). The Literacy Trek Volume 1, Issue 1(2015)28-36. Metacognition in Reading Comprehension, 1(1), 28–36.

Floris, F. D., & Divina, M. (2015). a Study on the Reading Skills of Efl University Students. TEFLIN Journal - A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 20(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v20i1/37-47

Forrest-Pressley, D. L., & Waller, T. G. (2013). Cognition, metacognition, and reading (Vol. 18). Springer Science & Business Media.

Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Retrieved from https://www.ssoar.info/

Meniado, J. C. (2016). Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Motivation, and Reading Comprehension Performance of Saudi EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 9(3), 117. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n3p117

Muhid, A., Amalia, E. R., Hilaliyah, H., Budiana, N., & Wajdi, M. B. N. (2020). The effect of metacognitive strategies implementation on students’ reading comprehension achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 847–862. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13257a

Muñoz, C., & Valenzuela, J. (2020). Demotivation in academic reading during teacher training. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12288

Mustajab Ahmed, R. (2020). Investigating EFL Learners’ Awareness of Cognitive and Metacognitive Reading Strategies of Students in Different Disciplines. Arab World English Journal, 11(3), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.18

Othman, Y., Mahamud, Z., & Jaidi, N. (2014). The Effects of Metacognitive Strategy in Reading Expository Text. International Education Studies, 7(13), 102-111.

Razı, S., & Çubukçu, F. (2014). Metacognition and Reading: Investigating Intervention and Comprehension of EFL Freshmen in Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 158, 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.090

Reza Ahmadi, M., Nizam Ismail, H., & Kamarul Kabilan Abdullah, M. (2013). The importance of metacognitive reading strategy awareness in reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n10p235

Schwartz, B. L., & Díaz, F. (2014). Quantifying human metacognition for the neurosciences. In The cognitive neuroscience of metacognition (pp. 9-23). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Thuy, N. T. T. (2020). Metacognitive Awareness of Using Reading Strategies by TESOL Postgraduates Intakes 11 and 12 at Ho Chi Minh City Open University. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(2), 157-167.

Zhang, L., & Seepho, S. (2013). Metacognitive strategy use and academic reading achievement: Insights from a Chinese context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1), 54–69.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-18

How to Cite

[1]
K. Wijaya, “English Education Master Students’ Perceptions on Metacognitive Strategy in Academic Reading”, JELPEDLIC, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 150-160, Feb. 2022.