Unlocking Reading Comprehension: A Comparative Study of Individual vs. Group Annotation Strategies

Authors

  • Caroline Victorine Katemba Universitas Advent Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.35974/acuity.v10i1.3806

Keywords:

reading comprehension, annotation strategies, individual annotation, group annotation, English as a foreign language

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of individual versus group annotation procedures in improving reading comprehension among students learning English as a foreign language. The study's goal is to examine the effects of two annotation procedures, individual and group annotations, on students' reading comprehension and analyze their reactions to these strategies. Data were obtained from two groups of eighth-grade students at SMPN 5 Lembang, one using individual annotation and the other employing group annotation methodologies. The study used pre- and post-tests to assess comprehension improvement, as well as statistical analyses (SPSS) to compare the two groups. The results showed that, while both strategies improved reading comprehension, students who used group annotation made larger gains. The group annotation approach also increased students' interest and motivation, as shown by more favorable responses to the strategy in post-treatment questionnaires. The findings indicate that group annotation is more effective than individual annotation in improving reading comprehension because it promotes better teamwork, motivation, and a deeper grasp of the material. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the need to tailor reading tactics to individual characteristics among students, implying that group annotation can be a more interesting and successful approach to developing reading abilities.

Article Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anjomshua, L & Zamanian, M. (2014). The Effect of Vocabulary Knowledge on Reading Comprehension of Iranian EFL Learners in Kerman Azad University. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 2(5), 90-95.

Arikunto. (2012). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Arikunto. (2013). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Ed.2 Cet.11. Jakarta: PT.

Bumi Aksara

Allington, R, L. (2011). What Really Matters for Struggling Readers. Boston: Pearson Education

Behroozi, M. A. (2014). Challenges to English Language Teacher of Secondary Schools in Iran. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 203-207.

Bridges, L (2014). The Joy and Power of Reading. San Francisco: Scholastic. Cicerchia, M. (2016). 3 Common Reading Problems for Students. London: Touch-

type Read and Spell.

Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching Languages for Young Learners. United Kingdom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cuningham, A. & Zibulsky, J. (2013). Book smart: How to Develop and Support Successful, motivated Readers. New York: Oxford University Press.

Data Referensi Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2017. Sekolah kita, 11, November

http://referensi.data.kemdikbud.go.id/tabs.php?npsn=20269787

Elbow, Peter. (2004).“Writing First!”. Educational Leadership, 62(2), 8–13.

Fitrawati, F, Ariansyah M. (2013). Annotation Strategy for Teaching Reading Comprehension of Exposition Texts. Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(2).

Fitriana, M, W. (2013). The Effectiveness of Using Summarization Technique in Teaching Reading Comprehension of the Second Year of Mtsn Pucanglaban Tulungagung in Academic Year 2012/2013. Tulungagung: State Islamic College.

Gilakjani, P, A. (2016). How can Students Improve Their Reading Comprehensio- n Skill. Journal of Studies in Education, 6(2), 229-237.

Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Reading motivation and engagement in middle and high school. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Engaging adolescents in reading (pp. 1- 16). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. [Online]. Available at: http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf [June 20th, 2017]

Hong, N, C. (2013). Teaching of Skimming at Tertiary Level: Theoretical and Pedagogical Issues. Bilingual & Multilingual Teachers of English An International Journal, 1(1), 1-7

Horbi. (2009). Model-model pembelajaran inovatif. Jember: Center of Society Studies Jember.

Huang, L. (2013). Reading Aloud In the Foreign Language Teaching. Asian Social Science, 148.

Jennings, Joyce.H., Caldwell, Joanne.S., Lerner, Janet. W. 2014. Reading Problems Asessment and Teaching Strategies. Seventh Edition. Boston Pearson.

Kacem, A,H., & Omheni, N. (2016). Improving Students’ Reading Comprehensi- on Achievement through Sharing Annotations in Peer Learning Environment. Conference Proceedings of the 20th Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education 2016. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Institute of Education.

Kacem, A,H., & Omheni, N. (2016). Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement through Sharing Annotations in Peer Learning Environment. Conference Proceedings of the 20th Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education 2016. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Institute of Education.

Kruideinier, J. (2002). Research Based Principles for Adult Basic Education Reading Instruction USA: The National Institute for Literacy.

Liu Xue-mei. (2015). An Effective Reading Process: The Application of Annotation to English as a Foreign Language Reading. Sino-US English Teaching, 12(5), 321-326.

Levy & Ma, L. (2004). Annotating a Text [Online Available https://www.ramapo.edu/crw/files/2013/03/20-2.pdf]

Published

2024-12-29

How to Cite

[1]
C. V. Katemba, “Unlocking Reading Comprehension: A Comparative Study of Individual vs. Group Annotation Strategies”, JELPEDLIC, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 97 - 113, Dec. 2024.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 > >>